Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Blueprint Money Mastery
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-05 23:18:37
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (159)
Related
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- How to Watch the 2023 Oscars on TV and Online
- More Than 30 States Sue Google Over 'Extravagant' Fees In Google Play Store
- Matthew Mazzotta: How Can We Redesign Overlooked Spaces To Better Serve The Public?
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Easter avalanche in French Alps kills 6, authorities say
- 2 men shot and killed near beach in Mexican resort of Acapulco
- Your Facebook Account Was Hacked. Getting Help May Take Weeks — Or $299
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Jason Aldean's 'Try That in a Small Town' scores record-breaking sales despite controversy
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- What's so fancy about the world's most advanced train station?
- Bezos Vs. Branson: The Billionaire Space Race Lifts Off
- Russia charges Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich with espionage, reports say
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- China wraps up war games around Taiwan, practicing for an attack as tension with U.S. mounts
- How A Joke TikTok About Country Music Stereotypes Hit The Radio
- Elevate Your Wardrobe With These Jaw-Dropping Banana Republic Deals
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Bezos Landed, Thanked Amazon Workers And Shoppers For Paying, Gave Away $200 Million
An Economist's Advice On Digital Dependency
Why It Took 13 Years to Get Avatar: The Way of Water Into Theaters
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
See Gisele Bündchen Strut Her Stuff While Pole Dancing in New Fashion Campaign
Jimmy Wales: How Can Wikipedia Ensure A Safe And Shared Online Space?
Russians Tied To The SolarWinds Cyberattack Hacked Federal Prosecutors, DOJ Says